Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Los Angeles Times Still padding Circulation?
Los Angeles Times press operator Mike Carlson sent this over this morning and you might find it interesting.
Publishers
David Laventhol 1989-1994
Richard Schlosberg III 1994-1997
Mark H. Willes 1997-1999
Kathryn M. Downing 1999-2000
John P. Puerner 2000-2005
Jeffrey M. Johnson 2005-2006
David D. Hiller 2006-2008
Eddy W. Hartenstein 2008-
1990-#1 daily metropolitan newspaper in the country.
1,225,189 daily 1,514,096 Sunday
Circulation
1/1994-1,138,353 daily 1,521,197 Sunday
3/2002- 985,798 daily 1,394,544 Sunday
9/2003- 955,211 daily 1,379,258 Sunday
3/2004- 983,727 daily 1,392,672 Sunday*
9/2004- 902,164 daily 1,292,274 Sunday
9/2005- 869,819 daily 1,247,569 Sunday
9/2006- 775,766 daily 1,172,005 Sunday
3/2007- 815,723 daily 1,173,096 Sunday**
3/2008- 773,884 daily 1,101,981 Sunday
9/2008- 739,147 daily 1,055,076 Sunday
3/2009- 723,181 daily 1,019,388 Sunday
9/2009- 657,467 daily 983,702 Sunday***
*Tribune circulation scandal
Some of Tribune’s newspapers were found guilty of padding their circulation numbers and an audit was going to be taken on other newspapers. As you can see, the Los Angeles Times’ circulation dropped dramatically after that. We were told that “freebie’s” would no longer count as circulation.
**Times manipulating circulation numbers again
The Times is counting “freebies” again, this time with a twist. Paid customers who have partial subscriptions for the week are receiving “freebies” on other days.
***Note: 10/24/09 1st Sunday-Bulldog total printed was 949,762
Are we still padding the circulation numbers? A difference of 33,940!
No comments:
Post a Comment
For now, we're opening this blog to Anonymous comments. This will continue as long as civility rules. Disagree as you may, just keep it clean and stay on topic. No profanity, and no name calling. We reserve the right to moderate such comments, though the person who made it may come back and reword their message in a more civil way.