Research from Duke
University provides new
evidence on the problem of “news deserts,” communities where news and
information about critical local issues is nonexistent or severely limited.
Researchers analyzed more than 16,000 news stories, gathered over seven days, across a hundred
“We wanted to assess the health of local journalism on a scale that hadn’t been done before, and in doing so we confirmed that the problem is as bad as we thought, maybe even worse,” said Philip Napoli, lead author of the study.
Among the findings: only about 17 percent of the news stories provided to a community are truly local, meaning about or having taken place within the municipality, and less than half (43 percent) of the news stories provided by local media outlets are original and produced by the local media outlet.
The study also found that communities closer to a large media market have less robust local journalism, larger proportions of Hispanic/Latino populations are associated with less robust local journalism and a community’s status as the county seat had no effect on the quantity or robustness of local journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
For now, we're opening this blog to Anonymous comments. This will continue as long as civility rules. Disagree as you may, just keep it clean and stay on topic. No profanity, and no name calling. We reserve the right to moderate such comments, though the person who made it may come back and reword their message in a more civil way.