Like most of the LA media world, ourselves included, LA Times editor Geoffrey Mohan was not impressed with the New York Times‘ extremely belated piece on the struggles at the LA Times under Tribune Company ownership. So he decided to let the NYT know about his displeasure, penning a letter to the paper that he CC’d to Romenesko and the Columbia Journalism Review.
A taste:
I was shocked today (1/24/11) to find there are people who gripe about the good
old days in Los Angeles, and I thank the New York Times for visiting our city to
tell us they were here. Equally, I thank you for couching your astonishing
discovery with dismissals of the late accomplishments of the bemoaned Los
Angeles Times.
“Never mind,” Jeremy Peters instructs, that “The [Los Angeles] Times is considered a front-runner to win a Pulitzer Prize this year for its coverage of city officials in Bell who gave themselves enormous salaries, a story that tapped into a growing national outrage over wasteful government spending.
“Or that it still maintains, despite all the bloodletting since the paper was bought in 2000 by the Tribune Company, 13 foreign bureaus, more than any other large metropolitan daily except The Washington Post.
“Or that it is the only big-city daily that still employs a battalion of correspondents stationed in cities across the country.
What matters, apparently, is that a 66-year-old merchant in a “quaint”
neighborhood misses “the old Hollywood starlets and socialites who graced the
society pages.” For that, we are not the “world-class paper” that we used to be.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment