| ||
|
Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts
Thursday, January 09, 2014
Mayor Eric Garcetti is back from The White House
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
I will vote for Obama in 2012
Who do you recognize in this painting? Share the name(s).
Thanks to Michelle Daniels for providing more information about this piece of art: http:// www.designtoscano.com/ product/wall+decor/ framed+art/historical/ callin'+the+red,+2010-+repl ica+painting+-+aa37.do?sor tby=bestSellers
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!
...
So much is at stake with this election. While we have concentrated on President Obama’s re-election we haven’t discussed the possibilities regarding a MORE CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT with a Romney Presidency.
If Romney were to win, we’d want to look at both the policy front as well as the judicial appointments possibilities. Here are some of the consequences of a MORE CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT:
• Could uphold onerous restrictions on a woman’s right to choose and otherwise limit her reproductive freedom – even overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade.
• Would not overturn Citizens United.
• Could be open to pre-New Deal interpretations of the Commerce Clause, which would dramatically restrict Congress’ ability to confront national problems.
• Might permit corporations to attempt to influence judicial decisions that could impact their bottom line.
• Likely to dramatically restrict efforts by Congress to remedy past discrimination in voting and elsewhere.
• Likely threaten diversity in higher education.
• Could not only stand in the way of full equality for the LGBT community but might also limit (or eliminate) the privacy rights of adults.
• Could turn back the clock on protections for people in police custody, and make it easier to establish a surveillance state.
• Could sanction the death penalty to be used on children and for
Could sanction the death penalty to be used on children and for a wider array of crimes, as well as on the mentally disabled.
• Would likely be much more deferential to presidential action in national security matters.
• Could weaken the separation of church and state and entangle religion and politics.”
Sources:
http://www.nerdwallet.com/ blog/markets/2012/ expert-faq-romneys-election -supreme-court/
http://www.cnn.com/2012/ 09/30/politics/ court-romney-list/ index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2012/ 09/30/politics/ court-obama-list/index.html
Thanks to Michelle Daniels for providing more information about this piece of art: http://
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!
...
~ps
So much is at stake with this election. While we have concentrated on President Obama’s re-election we haven’t discussed the possibilities regarding a MORE CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT with a Romney Presidency.
If Romney were to win, we’d want to look at both the policy front as well as the judicial appointments possibilities. Here are some of the consequences of a MORE CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT:
• Could uphold onerous restrictions on a woman’s right to choose and otherwise limit her reproductive freedom – even overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade.
• Would not overturn Citizens United.
• Could be open to pre-New Deal interpretations of the Commerce Clause, which would dramatically restrict Congress’ ability to confront national problems.
• Might permit corporations to attempt to influence judicial decisions that could impact their bottom line.
• Likely to dramatically restrict efforts by Congress to remedy past discrimination in voting and elsewhere.
• Likely threaten diversity in higher education.
• Could not only stand in the way of full equality for the LGBT community but might also limit (or eliminate) the privacy rights of adults.
• Could turn back the clock on protections for people in police custody, and make it easier to establish a surveillance state.
• Could sanction the death penalty to be used on children and for
Could sanction the death penalty to be used on children and for a wider array of crimes, as well as on the mentally disabled.
• Would likely be much more deferential to presidential action in national security matters.
• Could weaken the separation of church and state and entangle religion and politics.”
Sources:
http://www.nerdwallet.com/
http://www.cnn.com/2012/
http://www.cnn.com/2012/
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!
Friday, August 24, 2012
The lesser of two evils!
Haywood Galbreath, Sherita Herring, and James Bolden
Photo Credit: Lisa Bolden
By Haywood Galbreath
For all of you out there! Who have criticized the president of United States Obama! Said he has not done enough to help the people and the economy! Says that he is not an American and wants to destroy the American way! Says he is evil!
There’s another individual running for the presidency of the United States his name is Mitt Romney! Mitt Romney belongs to the party that basically has destroyed this nation! By all indications Mitt Romney does not truly care about the working class people and will try his best to put him and his friends at an even greater financial position off the backs of the middle class than they already are at! You can say this man and the party that he belongs to is evil!
Therefore if you’re saying that Obama is evil! And we know that by all indications that the Republican Party and Mitt Romney are evil!
Yet Obama has tried the help the American people! You would be wise! The go with the lesser of those two evils! Obama! Unless you just really ready to have pure evil run America! –HG--
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
2012 Presidential Medal of Freedom Ceremony
Ronnie Pineda meets Medal of Freedom recipient Dolores Huerta at May Day Rally.
President Obama presents exceptional individuals with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
President Obama presents exceptional individuals with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


